Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4749 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Returning to the nVidia universe. ;)
- From: John <yonaton@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 00:33:34 -0500
- Message-id: <200305140033.42397.yonaton@xxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 13 May 2003 19:06, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
> * Anders Johansson (andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx) [030513 17:01]:
> ->On Wednesday 14 May 2003 01:57, rex wrote:
> ->> Can you run 1600x1200 with the nVidia driver? nv will.
> ->
> ->I've been running 1600x1200 with full acceleration on this card for over
> a ->year, and on a geforce 2 before that.
>
> Well, I've got a Viewsonic 19' VX900 flat panel. It won't do over
> 1280x1024. So I think the Geforce4 MX440 covers that. Now doesn't anyone
> know if I should get PNY, Asus..etc..etc as far as the maker of the
> card? As I said the last nVidia based card I got was a Diamond..and I
> liked their cards until they went S3 then died.
>
> --
> Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@xxxxxxxxx
Hey Ben, I'd read either in here or in the linux NG, that someone was using
a Ti 4200 that was working without problems, and it was either Tiger Direct
or on Pricewatch.com I think it was only about $100. This was the PNY brand I
saw for that price too, and I'm gonna try to get it.
As for brands? i don't know...I've got a Hercules Prophet2 mx 400 running
perfectly on this system from 7.3 up to 8.2 (skipped 8.1), so as long as it's
nVidia based, I don't think it'll matter.
John
- --
A butterfly is: Pretty,soft,harmless...and useless,
just like M$N. My Penguin eats butterflies.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+wdU1H5oDXyLKXKQRAsbPAJwMkdoUV8z+MH2u6dNdYrjY7HxEiwCgjm1d
nR4dN6zs3tGcJTN5M88gIeM=
=1z7o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 13 May 2003 19:06, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
> * Anders Johansson (andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx) [030513 17:01]:
> ->On Wednesday 14 May 2003 01:57, rex wrote:
> ->> Can you run 1600x1200 with the nVidia driver? nv will.
> ->
> ->I've been running 1600x1200 with full acceleration on this card for over
> a ->year, and on a geforce 2 before that.
>
> Well, I've got a Viewsonic 19' VX900 flat panel. It won't do over
> 1280x1024. So I think the Geforce4 MX440 covers that. Now doesn't anyone
> know if I should get PNY, Asus..etc..etc as far as the maker of the
> card? As I said the last nVidia based card I got was a Diamond..and I
> liked their cards until they went S3 then died.
>
> --
> Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@xxxxxxxxx
Hey Ben, I'd read either in here or in the linux NG, that someone was using
a Ti 4200 that was working without problems, and it was either Tiger Direct
or on Pricewatch.com I think it was only about $100. This was the PNY brand I
saw for that price too, and I'm gonna try to get it.
As for brands? i don't know...I've got a Hercules Prophet2 mx 400 running
perfectly on this system from 7.3 up to 8.2 (skipped 8.1), so as long as it's
nVidia based, I don't think it'll matter.
John
- --
A butterfly is: Pretty,soft,harmless...and useless,
just like M$N. My Penguin eats butterflies.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+wdU1H5oDXyLKXKQRAsbPAJwMkdoUV8z+MH2u6dNdYrjY7HxEiwCgjm1d
nR4dN6zs3tGcJTN5M88gIeM=
=1z7o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |