Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4749 mails)

[Jon Clausen <dsl23212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:17:14AM +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> 
> > changed the build to 666 ;)
> 
> Ah! :-)
 
Indeed ;)
 
> > ... I mean, so long as the build is higher than any available patch it
> > *ought* to 'win', right?
> 
> Yes, it should.

Cool...

> I have used that trick before. Normally Suse does not
> update rpm's version for a suse version. But when you change the suse
> version then your rpm will be lower version than the new version and will
> be replced - ugh, I'm not explaining myself too well, am I? O:-)

Idunno... it's not too bad... reminded me a little of:

http://www.nightattheopera.net/contract.html

;D
 
> Ok, I mean that it will be honored till you upgrade the distro.
 
Or I figure out what *really* is the matter, and... well whereever that
might lead...

> > Evenso, it seems more like a workaround... to me a padlock means "locked"
> > period. (?)
> 
> Do you mean to say that the padlock or taboo setting, which did not work
> in suse 8.1, is not working either in suse 8.2? :-O
> 
> Too bad :-(

Yeah... I thought that *got* fixed in 8.1, though? Oh well, now at least I
know to look out for it :-P

Another question:

Do you guys see my From: correctly? I don't, and haven't since I introduced
folder-hooks in my .muttrc, in order to switch identity when replying to
mail in my band-folder... (which happened a couple of days *before* I
installed 8.2 and hence *should* be unrelated to the sasl-problem)

Cheers,
Jon Clausen

-- 
If we can't be free, at least we can be cheap!