On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 02:30:17PM -0700, Christopher Mahmood wrote:
* Jon Clausen (dsl23212@vip.cybercity.dk) [030504 04:21]:
But I wonder:
Why wouldn't the SuSE rpm come with the sasl2 option compiled in? I mean I don't see sasl (1) on the disks anywhere...
It does use sasl2, see the spec file. The 8.1 package used sasl.
Hmm. Well if sasl2 is used, then there must be something else in the rpm that doesn't like my setup... I'll have a look at the spec file. Fact remains that shortly after I posted the 'Fixed Mutt...' msg, I ran an online update which updated my self compiled rpm with build 220, and after that Mutt was back at hanging on authentication. :-P So I went and 'checkinstalled' once more, and Mutt works. So there. As an aside, how do I tell YOU to leave that rpm untouched? I would have thought that the padlock was YOU's way of telling me that it regocnized this rpm as something it shouldn't update? TIA Jon Clausen -- If we can't be free, at least we can be cheap!