Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4165 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Date problems (was "Hacked!!")
- From: Tom Emerson <osnut@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:55:06 -0700
- Message-id: <200304231455.09943.osnut@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 31 December 1969 4:00 pm, Matt Stamm wrote:
> What do you mean my clock is set to 1.1.70?
- From the headers of your message, I see the following:
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 103 14:29:15 PDT
which I suspect is a not-quite-year-2000-compliant e-mail client. My client
cannot interpret that date, so it shows as "unknown". I suspect that the
person who complained about it being "1.1.70" has a client that cannot parse
this [invalid] date and thus returns a zero -- "zero" in [unix] time terms is
January 1st, 1970
- --
Yet another Blog: http://osnut.homelinux.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://osnut.homelinux.net/TomEmerson.asc
iD8DBQE+pwu9V/YHUqq2SwsRAqmMAKC82UoXZf5rfU/1RG8ZkVej9ArHFQCeIuMf
XI0vJestF9ECVuPjnrvIkrQ=
=qfo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 31 December 1969 4:00 pm, Matt Stamm wrote:
> What do you mean my clock is set to 1.1.70?
- From the headers of your message, I see the following:
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 103 14:29:15 PDT
which I suspect is a not-quite-year-2000-compliant e-mail client. My client
cannot interpret that date, so it shows as "unknown". I suspect that the
person who complained about it being "1.1.70" has a client that cannot parse
this [invalid] date and thus returns a zero -- "zero" in [unix] time terms is
January 1st, 1970
- --
Yet another Blog: http://osnut.homelinux.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://osnut.homelinux.net/TomEmerson.asc
iD8DBQE+pwu9V/YHUqq2SwsRAqmMAKC82UoXZf5rfU/1RG8ZkVej9ArHFQCeIuMf
XI0vJestF9ECVuPjnrvIkrQ=
=qfo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |