Hi Matt, <snip>
One should never get sick of KDE. It is very flexible and is very user friendly. I find that KDE and Gnome are almost identical in look/feel to me anyway. Reinventing the wheel is never good, especially in software. The only difference between the 2 that I see is that I can make Gnome 1.4 crash while I still can't get KDE 3.0 to. But I did crash Konquerer... What a piece of crap browser...No disrepect to the developers but gosh... I think the world would be better off with just Mozilla (Firebird).
~~Nick
I am sure Microsoft also believes every other browser should die >>off and IE be the only one :). Seriously, has to have something good >>about it if Apple wanted to rip it off...
Thats what competition is for :-)
Yes I do use Konq, yes its not perfect, no its not crappy...Crappy >>was Netscape 4.7x, now that was horrid! And it was all we had in terms >>of GUI capable browsers for too long...
The other thing I hate about konq is that it also acts as a file manager. That right there introduces tons of bugs in the code. I think browser/file manager should be 2 separate programs. I like nautilus much better than konq or windows explorer. I can't even view namesys.com with konq. It comes up with greek text. ~~Nick _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!