I think what you are saying is fine to a point, but perhaps better voiced in a political forum. I've been serving in the US military since 1966 (started as an E-1 and currently an O-6), have willing served during three wars to date, and believe that one of the reasons I so do is to protect those special privileges guaranteed by our Constitution, but I don't think this site is the place for all this bickering. Could we perhaps move it off line. dave Ben Rosenberg wrote:
* Patrick Shanahan (WideGlide@MyRealBox.com) [030407 17:07]: ->* Bruce Marshall
[04-07-03 18:39]: ->> On Monday 07 April 2003 19:10 pm, Landy Roman wrote: ->> > ->> > "The new millennium quickly brought two terrible new crimes, added to ->> > the gloomy record of persisting ones. ->> > The first was 911 and the second was the United States response to ->> > them" ->> ->> Should we turn the other cheek?????? ->> ->> I think you should take your sig to some other medium unless you want to ->> debate the issue. -> ->Agreed. *THIS* is not the proper channel. I think his sig can be whatever the damn hell he wants it to be. And it has nothing to do with not being a proud American. If you don't like his sig ignore it..this is an "International list". The redneck response of " if you decent, your un-American " is a bunch of hog wash..I bet the Nazi's and Mr. Hussein told their people that decention was unpatriotic..oh wait they didn't..they just killed them. Read the Constitution before you spout off in public about a sig file again.
This is general response to anyone who believes in selectively interpreting the Constitution ..it's not OK as long as you agree with what's said. It's OK because others died to make it so.
/end rant
-- David C. Johanson Linux Counter # 116410 Powered by SuSE Linux 7.1 People who behold a phenomenon will often extend their thinking beyond it; people who merely hear about the phenomenon will not be moved to think at all. -- Goethe