22 Mar
2003
22 Mar
'03
10:51
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, John just had to get this off his chest:
In a previous message, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
On Friday 21 March 2003 02:39, John Pettigrew wrote: [..]
However, PGP 6.58 fails to verify your sig.
gpg-1.2.1-1 has no problem
For the record, that wasn't me!
I never said it was. I reacted to Rex who commented on Mitch, commenting on your comments ;-) So the last bit ("However, PGP 6.58 fails to verify your sig.") was Rex's. Cheers, Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 27N , 4 29 45E. SuSE 8.0 x86 Kernel k_Athlon 2.4.19-4GB See headers for PGP/GPG info.