Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3166 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] [OT] PGP - Was [SLE] 8.2 Announced
- From: rex <rex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:29:12 -0800
- Message-id: <20030322032912.GB1318@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Theo v. Werkhoven <twe-suse.e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2003-03-21 17:25]:
>
> Both peoples gpg/pgp sigs work without a hitch in Mutt 1.4.1i and
> gpg-1.2.1-1
> I suggest you try a "real" MUA
> <g,d&r>
I also use Mutt (1.4i) and your message gives a bad signature warning from
PGP 6.5.8. Messages sent from myself have OK sigs and decryption from
PGP/Eudora works. Oddly, if your message is saved directly from the
/var/mail/rex file, the sig checks OK with PGP 6.5.8.
I spent over an hour trying to find out why your message gives a bad sig
warning in Mutt from PGP 6.5.8 without any productive result. :(
BTW, note that I changed OT to [OT] in the subject. It makes filtering more
accurate.
And, I certainly agree that Mutt is a "real" MUA. Best there is, IMO.
www.mutt.org
-rex
--
The King has note of all that they intend,
By interception which they dream not of.
--William Shakespeare, _Henry V_, Act II, Scene 2
>
> Both peoples gpg/pgp sigs work without a hitch in Mutt 1.4.1i and
> gpg-1.2.1-1
> I suggest you try a "real" MUA
> <g,d&r>
I also use Mutt (1.4i) and your message gives a bad signature warning from
PGP 6.5.8. Messages sent from myself have OK sigs and decryption from
PGP/Eudora works. Oddly, if your message is saved directly from the
/var/mail/rex file, the sig checks OK with PGP 6.5.8.
I spent over an hour trying to find out why your message gives a bad sig
warning in Mutt from PGP 6.5.8 without any productive result. :(
BTW, note that I changed OT to [OT] in the subject. It makes filtering more
accurate.
And, I certainly agree that Mutt is a "real" MUA. Best there is, IMO.
www.mutt.org
-rex
--
The King has note of all that they intend,
By interception which they dream not of.
--William Shakespeare, _Henry V_, Act II, Scene 2
| < Previous | Next > |