On Friday 21 March 2003 13:13, rex wrote:
However, PGP 6.58 fails to verify your sig.
Anyone been able to get a good sig report on Mitch's sigs? (yes, Mitch's public key is on my keyring).
I second John's suggestion to sign messages using PGP/MIME. Sigs that don't verify are not of much use.
When I see a message signed by me in KMail, I get this (indented by me for clarity): Message was signed by James M. THompson (Key ID: 0xB0AF66AE). The signature is valid, but the key is untrusted. -- Mitch Thompson, San Antonio TX // WB5UZG Red Hat Certified Engineer (RHCE) http://home.satx.rr.com/mlthompson Independent Amsoil Dealer http://amsdealer.webhop.biz wget -O - http://home.satx.rr.com/mlthompson/pubkey.gpg | gpg --import -- "There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't." I occasionally get emails stating they cannot verify my key. When I created my key, I created a 2048-bit key (yah, way overboard, I know). Also, it is a key type of "ElGamal". It was created 2 years ago, today (what a coincidence). Could the key type be the cause of the problem? I forget why I chose ElGamal versus DSA. Now, I need to go read up on problems with ElGamal versus DSA. End of signed message -- Mitch Thompson, San Antonio TX // WB5UZG Red Hat Certified Engineer (RHCE) http://home.satx.rr.com/mlthompson Independent Amsoil Dealer http://amsdealer.webhop.biz wget -O - http://home.satx.rr.com/mlthompson/pubkey.gpg | gpg --import -- "There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't."