The 03.03.21 at 11:33, John Pettigrew wrote:
In this case, I'm sure that kmail is actually getting it right [snip] It's obviously a MessPro failing
Actually, I've just checked and Mozilla (with enigmail) doesn't get it "right" either. Perhaps only kmail does?
Both Tom Emerson and Mitch Thompson (both using KMail/1.5) are checked alright by Pine, I don't see the pgp/gpg signature (I don't even see the "normal" signature!); what I see is this at the bottom: |>------------ Output from gpg ------------ |>gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information |>gpg: Signature made Fri 21 Mar 2003 12:03:19 PM CET using DSA key ID AAB64B0B |>gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Which is normal, as I haven't imported the key - and won't bother, in fact :-) However, mozilla (with enigmail) doesn't see it right; this is what it shows: |>- -- |>Yet another Blog: http://osnut.homelinux.net |>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |>Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |>Comment: http://osnut.homelinux.net/TomEmerson.asc |> |>iD8DBQE+evuoV/YHUqq2SwsRAhqcAJ9Jm39J6tsFuJQPQqDNF5e4tH6uYgCeIbxI |>ErBefe1l3yhcVIk/nWNlHjA= |>=8r0y |>-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Perhaps it is because kmail inserts an extra "=2D", which can be seen looking at the source: |>=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- That makes some MUA cough, and has been comented here as well. -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson