-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 21 March 2003 3:25 am, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Tom Emerson
[03-21-03 06:06]: [big snip] But, your sig is minimal in comparison to the objection. It also does not show a ..sig-indicator.. here, mutt v1.5.4i which has had gpg/pgp support built in for many versions.
whups -- my fault -- as I mentioned in passing, some (most? all?) clients "pre-load" the signature when replying, [which I see it has done here] and either (a) I cut it out [unlikely, but not impossible] or (b) for some reason kmail used a different "identity" [which is what determines which "sig" gets used] As such, I merely typed my name at the end and hit "send"
Appears that kmail has developed its own agenda with respect to gpg/pgp (and I hate to say it) similar to lookout and lookout express. They (lookout, etal) cough up gpg/pgp/mime.
Actually, "the most current" version of kmail [for the kde 3.1 series] technically uses the "agypten" plugin, which is supposed to make it multipart-mime with a detached signature. So far, I haven't jumped through the hoops neccessary to add in this "plug in" support [partly because there were some suse specific issues, I think] so the program sort-of drops back to the "old" in-line support [which is probably better considering the current discussion of message lengths -- 'multipart/mime" just adds that many more lines to deal with...]
This discorse *should* *probably* be moved to suse-kde ??
there is such? [hopefully there isn't much traffic on that one -- the couple of hundred messages here and on the "openoffice.org" list keep me busy enough as it is... ;) ] - -- Yet another Blog: http://osnut.homelinux.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://osnut.homelinux.net/TomEmerson.asc iD8DBQE+evuoV/YHUqq2SwsRAhqcAJ9Jm39J6tsFuJQPQqDNF5e4tH6uYgCeIbxI ErBefe1l3yhcVIk/nWNlHjA= =8r0y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----