* Tom Emerson <osnut@pacbell.net> [03-21-03 06:06]: [big snip]
Unfortunately this requires cooperation of people who aren't using kmail to tell the developers of kmail where things aren't correct -- not always an easy task :(
Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://osnut.homelinux.net/TomEmerson.asc
iD8DBQE+evF3V/YHUqq2SwsRAt4aAJ93GIBSZR6jgvCkOfm3ZFR4DepSagCfS0xx drQFSvPAzdO2sc/uadiMEO4= =rx/S -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
[note] siq quoted as seen for example/discussion.... But, your sig is minimal in comparison to the objection. It also does not show a ..sig-indicator.. here, mutt v1.5.4i which has had gpg/pgp support built in for many versions. Appears that kmail has developed its own agenda with respect to gpg/pgp (and I hate to say it) similar to lookout and lookout express. They (lookout, etal) cough up gpg/pgp/mime. You noted in a private post that quoted_printable handling by mutt could be the problem, but that is not the case. This discorse *should* *probably* be moved to suse-kde ?? -- Patrick Shanahan Please avoid TOFU and trim >quotes< http://wahoo.no-ip.org Registered Linux User #207535 icq#173753138 @ http://counter.li.org Linux, a continuous *learning* experience