On Wednesday 26 February 2003 17.31, Oliver Ob wrote:
Rikard Johnels schrieb:
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 17.23, Oliver Ob wrote:
Anders Johansson schrieb:
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 16:49, Oliver Ob wrote:
I did the del command, verified with route -n (empty output) and did the add command. Then started a ping from #B to #A, but the same error as posted before comes.
Where is the mistake?
No idea. Maybe there's a problem with the hub or switch you're using?! Try moving the cables around to different sockets in the hub, maybe the ones you're using aren't talking to each other
I do not use a switch. It is pure BNC cables.
See, its plainly like #A ---- #B ---- #C with #B having a "T"-BNC-piece.
So when #A and #C share NFS and talk to each other, why would #B not talk to #A, but to #C ?!?!?!?!?
Is #A and C# side terminated? Can you ping yourself? (ie. can #A ping #A)
Verified that.
#a and #c are terminated.
#c can ping to #b and #a and itself
#a can ping to #c and itself, but not to #b
#b can ping to #c and itself, but not to #a
so the problem must be between #a and #b
hm.
thanks for your thoughts. Verified it by hand.
What if you disconnect #C ? Terminate #B and run the test between #A and #B alone. Do you by chance have a stray IPTABLE/IPCHAIN rule laying around complicating things? -- /Rikard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rikard Johnels email : rjhn@linux.nu Web : http://www.rikjoh.com Mob : +46 70 464 99 39 ------------------------ Public PGP fingerprint ---------------------------- < 15 28 DF 78 67 98 B2 16 1F D3 FD C5 59 D4 B6 78 46 1C EE 56 >