Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3103 mails)

[<gedi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for your input Karol.

Can anyone else shed any light on this issue?

Do use the same patches as Karol, different patches or do you build with the SuSE kernel source. I still can't get this 2.4.19 SuSE kernel to compile.

Thanks

> 
> From: Karol Pietrzak <kap4020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2003/02/24 Mon AM 12:15:12 GMT
> To: suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [SLE] [kallsyms] Error 1
> 
> On Sunday 23 February 2003 16:26, Bruce Marshall wrote:
> 
> > I agree with the use of 2.4.20.  I've used a lot of non-SuSE kernels
> > and I've never noticed anything missing other than the 'pretty
> > boot-up screen' you get with an SuSE install.  I can live without
> > that.
> 
> I imagine most people do the same thing.  Personally, I wanted 2.4.20 
> for its reiserfs speedups and VM fixes, so using mantel's sources was 
> not an issue.
> 
> What patches do you apply when you roll your own?  Whenever I built my 
> own kernel, I do / apply the following patches:
> 
> - RML's preemptive patch
> - loop-AES + ciphers (for reading partitions encrypted using YaST2)
> - lm_sensors (for reading the temperture of my CPU)
> - grsecurity
> - change HZ to 1000 in linux/include/asm-i386/param.h
> 
> Anything else I am missing / would find interesting?
> 
> -- 
> Check the headers for your unsubscription address
> For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
> Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
> Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
> 
> 
>