Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3103 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] glibc > 2.3
- From: Anders Johansson <andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 01 Feb 2003 11:40:41 +0100
- Message-id: <1044096040.3125.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 11:28, Derek Fountain wrote:
> Anyone care to explain this to Adobe when trying to persuade them to port
> Photoshop, et al?
Your problems stem largely from using c++. If your app was written in C
you could even compile your app against libc5 and have it work in most
environments. All distros I know of ship compatibility libs. shlibs.rpm
in suse, for example.
What language did Adobe use for Photoshop?
--
Anders Johansson <andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Anyone care to explain this to Adobe when trying to persuade them to port
> Photoshop, et al?
Your problems stem largely from using c++. If your app was written in C
you could even compile your app against libc5 and have it work in most
environments. All distros I know of ship compatibility libs. shlibs.rpm
in suse, for example.
What language did Adobe use for Photoshop?
--
Anders Johansson <andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx>
| < Previous | Next > |