Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4343 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] GKrellm and lm_sensors
- From: Thibaut Cousin <cousin@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:12:07 +0100
- Message-id: <200211131712.10353.cousin@xxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 13 Novembre 2002 17:02, Togan Muftuoglu a écrit :
> >> > touche /etc/modules.conf /lib/modules/2.4.19-4GB/modules.dep
> >>
> >> And why not "depmod -a"
> >
> > I haven't tried this one.
> > Sorry, I made a typo. The command is "touch", not "touche".
>
> man depmod
>
> depmod - handle dependency descriptions for loadable kernel modules
>
> man touch
>
> touch - change file timestamps
>
> Looks to me for the above case depmod is a better solution yet YMMV
No. The problem you have is not a dependency problem. The module manager
just checks that modules.conf (the configuration file) and modules.dep (the
dependency file) have the same age.
It can indeed happen that different ages for those files indicates a kernel
change that has not been taken in account everywhere. But if all you do is
changing modules.conf and not the kernel, then there is no real problem and
you can ignore the warning.
"Touching" the two files makes them the same age, so the warning disappears.
- --
Thibaut Cousin
E-mail : cousin@xxxxxxxx
Web : http://clrwww.in2p3.fr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE90nnZv1vqsTa1E4oRAmuIAKDNYZk06l/GriAsXl3R0t+F69pclQCfV3Ew
IH6EcKUGn4e70HM+GPCgVn4=
=ECS/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 13 Novembre 2002 17:02, Togan Muftuoglu a écrit :
> >> > touche /etc/modules.conf /lib/modules/2.4.19-4GB/modules.dep
> >>
> >> And why not "depmod -a"
> >
> > I haven't tried this one.
> > Sorry, I made a typo. The command is "touch", not "touche".
>
> man depmod
>
> depmod - handle dependency descriptions for loadable kernel modules
>
> man touch
>
> touch - change file timestamps
>
> Looks to me for the above case depmod is a better solution yet YMMV
No. The problem you have is not a dependency problem. The module manager
just checks that modules.conf (the configuration file) and modules.dep (the
dependency file) have the same age.
It can indeed happen that different ages for those files indicates a kernel
change that has not been taken in account everywhere. But if all you do is
changing modules.conf and not the kernel, then there is no real problem and
you can ignore the warning.
"Touching" the two files makes them the same age, so the warning disappears.
- --
Thibaut Cousin
E-mail : cousin@xxxxxxxx
Web : http://clrwww.in2p3.fr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE90nnZv1vqsTa1E4oRAmuIAKDNYZk06l/GriAsXl3R0t+F69pclQCfV3Ew
IH6EcKUGn4e70HM+GPCgVn4=
=ECS/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |