Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4348 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] KMail and replying to list
- From: zentara <zentara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:32:36 -0400
- Message-id: <20021015083236.6ce519be.zentara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:30:11 +0200
Anders Johansson <andjoh2001@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>That is absolutely corret behaviour. Any mail program that does not send
>to the "reply-to" address when using "reply", or that won't send to all
>addresses when using "Reply-all" is broken.
>
>> Or, at least
>> it does when responding to certain types of
>> mail-list handlers.
>> With some others, when I hit "Reply", I'm
>> replying to the list.
>
>On suse-linux-e? Without any pre-processing? Then they are broken.
I'm using the latest Sylpheed-claws8.5 and it has fixed the annoying
"reply-to" behavior with lists.
It used to be when you hit "Reply-to" you would get the list and original
sender in the "To:", and you needed to remove the sender.
Now, with suse-linux-e, if I hit "Reply" , only suse-linux-e gets put in the
"To:", and I need to "Reply to all" to get both the list and the sender.
I don't know if that is "correct behavior", but I like it.
--
use Perl; #powerful programmable prestidigitation
Anders Johansson <andjoh2001@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>That is absolutely corret behaviour. Any mail program that does not send
>to the "reply-to" address when using "reply", or that won't send to all
>addresses when using "Reply-all" is broken.
>
>> Or, at least
>> it does when responding to certain types of
>> mail-list handlers.
>> With some others, when I hit "Reply", I'm
>> replying to the list.
>
>On suse-linux-e? Without any pre-processing? Then they are broken.
I'm using the latest Sylpheed-claws8.5 and it has fixed the annoying
"reply-to" behavior with lists.
It used to be when you hit "Reply-to" you would get the list and original
sender in the "To:", and you needed to remove the sender.
Now, with suse-linux-e, if I hit "Reply" , only suse-linux-e gets put in the
"To:", and I need to "Reply to all" to get both the list and the sender.
I don't know if that is "correct behavior", but I like it.
--
use Perl; #powerful programmable prestidigitation
| < Previous | Next > |