Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3225 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Re: security hole?
- From: Anders Johansson <andjoh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:45:37 +0200
- Message-id: <200207150145.37486.andjoh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Monday 15 July 2002 01.00, Lee Mavrogenis wrote:
> Marcel (and Ben as well),
>
> Thank you. I have embedded a couple of comments. Please note there was
> never
>
> any intent on my part to troll--so lets be clear about that.
Of course there was. It was a classic troll, and you even admitted it.
>
> With regard to security breaches:
> -- Yes, I believe I stated as much (in essense) in my post as follows --
> "Granted, almost without exception any security scheme can be
> breached....."
>
> As far as root access from a boot/rescue disk (again, this being in context
> to the original posted complaint) - within that strict context I am not
> aware of being able use a boot disk with W2k Server or Advanced Server to
> acquire root (admin) permissions - unless you do a full install. (I not
> talking about just being able to puruse the data on the disk I am talking
> about being able to serreptitiously act as the administrator -- by using a
> simple boot or rescue disk.) If you know how to do this I am certainly
> willing to listen.
You may be right, I don't know. You'd have to go to a windows discussion forum
for that. BUT it's not because windows is in any way more secure, it looks
like the guys in Redmond want to earn a few $$$ on what is in the *nix world
(NB! ANY *nix dialect, including ALL versions of RedHat, ALL versions of
*BSD) a routine procedure
http://www.lostpassword.com/windows-xp-2000-nt.htm
//Anders
> Marcel (and Ben as well),
>
> Thank you. I have embedded a couple of comments. Please note there was
> never
>
> any intent on my part to troll--so lets be clear about that.
Of course there was. It was a classic troll, and you even admitted it.
>
> With regard to security breaches:
> -- Yes, I believe I stated as much (in essense) in my post as follows --
> "Granted, almost without exception any security scheme can be
> breached....."
>
> As far as root access from a boot/rescue disk (again, this being in context
> to the original posted complaint) - within that strict context I am not
> aware of being able use a boot disk with W2k Server or Advanced Server to
> acquire root (admin) permissions - unless you do a full install. (I not
> talking about just being able to puruse the data on the disk I am talking
> about being able to serreptitiously act as the administrator -- by using a
> simple boot or rescue disk.) If you know how to do this I am certainly
> willing to listen.
You may be right, I don't know. You'd have to go to a windows discussion forum
for that. BUT it's not because windows is in any way more secure, it looks
like the guys in Redmond want to earn a few $$$ on what is in the *nix world
(NB! ANY *nix dialect, including ALL versions of RedHat, ALL versions of
*BSD) a routine procedure
http://www.lostpassword.com/windows-xp-2000-nt.htm
//Anders
| < Previous | Next > |