Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3378 mails)

[Jesse Marlin <jlm@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Brian Durant writes:
 > On Wednesday 27 March 2002 10:03, jon@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
 > > It sounds like your default gateway / route is wrong... can you email the
 > > following;
 > >
 > > 1. Output of "ifconfig"
 > 
 > I don't believe that I ever got a response to this posting, so I will try 
 > again. Hopefully the thread isn't irretrievably broken.
 > 
 > Here is ifconfig:
 > 
 > eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:2C:01:2B:1B
 >           inet addr:192.168.1.100  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
 >           inet6 addr: fe80::250:2cff:fe01:2b1b/10 Scope:Link
 >           UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
 >           RX packets:2163 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
 >           TX packets:2079 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
 >           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
 >           RX bytes:602395 (588.2 Kb)  TX bytes:153166 (149.5 Kb)
 >           Interrupt:11 Base address:0xec00
 > 
 > lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
 >           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
 >           inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
 >           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
 >           RX packets:70 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
 >           TX packets:70 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
 >           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
 >           RX bytes:4564 (4.4 Kb)  TX bytes:4564 (4.4 Kb)
 > 
 > > 2. Output of "route -n"
 > 
 > Kernel IP routing table
 > Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
 > 192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
 > 0.0.0.0         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
 > 

The routing table looks good.  Is that 192.168.1.1 a router?  Does the
NT box's routing match this.  The netmask will be important.  The only other
thing I can offer is that if 192.168.1.1 is a router, make sure it knows
about your address, and also make sure the cables are good.