12 Apr
2002
12 Apr
'02
17:54
First network 10.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 Second network 10.0.1.0 255.255.254.0
In no way do I mean to sound rude - but isn't that completely wrong? Doesn't the above subnet mask mean that those addresses are on the same subnet? If the subnet mask ends at the 23rd binary digit then 10.0.0.x and 10.0.1.x are in the same subnet - the first 23 binary digits are 00001010 00000000 0000000 - and doesn't that mean they both exist within the same host area of the last 9 binary digits? Wouldn't you need a 255.255.255.0 subnet mask in this case? This looks awfully similar to 2 class C networks and all class C's have 255.255.255.0 as the subnet mask. John W Higgins john@wishdev.com