2 Apr
2002
2 Apr
'02
02:58
On Monday 01 April 2002 07:13 pm, Doug McGarrett wrote:
Since another correspondent said go get 641D right away, it's the last chance, and now you say you are installing 642, please enlighten the rest of us, what's up? Should we get 641D? Or is 642 ready to fly? Thanx. --doug
Sorry for the confusion. I did not say to get OO641D right away. I said that there have been some improvements, and that if you would like to contribute to the 1.0 release, then get the 641D release as it is the last test build. 642 is the development, unstable build. I pointed this out because some people tend to complain on this list about software packages they don't like instead of taking some time to contribute. Here is a chance to contribute, FWIW.