11 Mar
2002
11 Mar
'02
06:54
On Thursday 01 January 1970 01.00, Purple Shirt wrote:
Sure. Just because Microsoft gives a selected group of software developers the source code to Windows does that make Windows open-source? Simply being able to read the source doesn't make it open-source in the sense of the GPL.
MS allows a select few to look at their source SuSE allows people to look at it, rewrite it, dance with it, marry it, *anything except selling it* Do you *really* feel right about comparing the two? //Anders