Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2886 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] linux or suse
- From: Sjoerd Hiemstra <shiems@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 19:18:41 +0100
- Message-id: <02020518545303.00441@earth>
Lenz Grimmer:
> Tom Nicholson:
> > This will seem laughable to some of you, but I'm trying to figure
> > out why lilo presents a choice of Linux or SuSE (or Memory Test)?
> >
> > The mem test I can understand. But I thought SuSE was a Linux. I'm
> > suspecting it may have something to do with different kernels, but
> > am clueless beyond that.
>
> Yes, this label is admittedly badly labeled. "SuSE" is some kind of a
> fallback, if you compile your own kernel and can't boot it anymore.
> This image is a copy of the SuSE default kernel.
You could check /etc/lilo.conf to see what the label "SuSE" refers to.
In my case, it referred to just nothing, because I had overlooked
something in the Lilo configuration in Yast during installation....
SH
> Tom Nicholson:
> > This will seem laughable to some of you, but I'm trying to figure
> > out why lilo presents a choice of Linux or SuSE (or Memory Test)?
> >
> > The mem test I can understand. But I thought SuSE was a Linux. I'm
> > suspecting it may have something to do with different kernels, but
> > am clueless beyond that.
>
> Yes, this label is admittedly badly labeled. "SuSE" is some kind of a
> fallback, if you compile your own kernel and can't boot it anymore.
> This image is a copy of the SuSE default kernel.
You could check /etc/lilo.conf to see what the label "SuSE" refers to.
In my case, it referred to just nothing, because I had overlooked
something in the Lilo configuration in Yast during installation....
SH
| < Previous | Next > |