Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4393 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] Linux vs Windows
  • From: Doug McGarrett <dougmack@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 00:20:54 -0500
  • Message-id: <200111140521.fAE5Lmw11681@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I think Palm is holding its own. Or maybe better than.
Wordstar shot themselves in the foot, as far as I can tell.
I used it until Win 3.1, and their version of a GUI
word processor was junk. I went to WP 5.1 as soon as
I could, and I wish we could have that version today. Or 5.2.
I still have the disks, but it can't deal with MSWord. And
the latest Corel is not nearly as friendly, and you can no longer
get free telephone help. I don't think Be was ever a contender,
even tho it was interesting. DeLorme has very good map software,
and I doubt that MS is up to it. It also supports GPS. Quarterdeck
is obsolete. I don't think MS put them under, it just wasn't
necessary anymore. AFAIK, RealAudio is still around. I don't
know how they make any money on free downloads, tho.

At 22:50 11/13/2001 -0600, Timothy R.Butler wrote:
>
>> That's why 3rd
>> party vendors (e.g. Symantec, Powerquest, etc.) are not worried
>> that MS keeps adding features to Windows. The default
>
> If those guys don't fear Microsoft, then they get what they deserve.
>However, first they should talk to Novell, Corel, Lotus, Netscape, Sun,
>Apple, Intuit, Palm, Be, Oracle, Digital Research, Quarterdeck, Geo, Real,
>Roxio, WordStar, and many more. Also should I mention those that gave up and
>sold out to Microsoft? AutoMap, Fox Systems (I think that was the name),
>Visio... All of these companies are either currently in nasty wars with, or
>have lost such wars with Microsoft (even if their products were better).
>
> And even more importantly, most of them lost by resting on the laurels
>while Microsoft slowly drained their marketshare...
>



< Previous Next >
This Thread