Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3784 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] ATI Radeon [what is your favorite video card?]
- From: Dee McKinney <deem@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 09:47:33 -0900 (AKST)
- Message-id: <200110281847.f9SIlXF05437@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Nick,
While there is alot more to ask about what you need to do your requirements,
I run ATI XPERT 2000 32M AGP cards in the W98 & W2000 clients with no problems,
I run a Radeon 64M DDR AGP in my dual boot work station. It has a Nokia 445PRO
21" monitor attached which complements the card well. While I'n not a gamer,
I can push this card a lot higher than 1600x1200 -24bit. It's solid, and I have no issue
with it's performance. SaX2 finds it no problem. Etc.
I usually recommend ATI or Matox due to these having the least problems
and rock solid performance. Howbeit there needs to be comensurate monitor
and system to enjoy a nice card.
/Dee
Nick Webb <nickw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> After having many troubles with my gforce 256 SDR the last couple of
> days (and may other time over its life), I decided 'to heck with it' and am
> looking at a new card. I like the performance of the gforce, but the drivers
> are always sketchy, right now I can only do 2D (using XFree's nv driver).
> I've heard that the ATI Radeon's are good, but looking at SuSE's hardware
> database I see 'Problematically' by the cards, what kind of luck have
> you guys had with these cards? Are there any other cards that are good
> for 2D and 3D? I need something that can push 1600x1200-24bit color
> @85Hz and play games like Quake III at decent frame-rates (I get around
> 70 with 800x600 High Quality in QIIIA now).
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Nick Webb
> http://www.uidaho.edu/~nickw/
While there is alot more to ask about what you need to do your requirements,
I run ATI XPERT 2000 32M AGP cards in the W98 & W2000 clients with no problems,
I run a Radeon 64M DDR AGP in my dual boot work station. It has a Nokia 445PRO
21" monitor attached which complements the card well. While I'n not a gamer,
I can push this card a lot higher than 1600x1200 -24bit. It's solid, and I have no issue
with it's performance. SaX2 finds it no problem. Etc.
I usually recommend ATI or Matox due to these having the least problems
and rock solid performance. Howbeit there needs to be comensurate monitor
and system to enjoy a nice card.
/Dee
Nick Webb <nickw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> After having many troubles with my gforce 256 SDR the last couple of
> days (and may other time over its life), I decided 'to heck with it' and am
> looking at a new card. I like the performance of the gforce, but the drivers
> are always sketchy, right now I can only do 2D (using XFree's nv driver).
> I've heard that the ATI Radeon's are good, but looking at SuSE's hardware
> database I see 'Problematically' by the cards, what kind of luck have
> you guys had with these cards? Are there any other cards that are good
> for 2D and 3D? I need something that can push 1600x1200-24bit color
> @85Hz and play games like Quake III at decent frame-rates (I get around
> 70 with 800x600 High Quality in QIIIA now).
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Nick Webb
> http://www.uidaho.edu/~nickw/
| < Previous | Next > |