It's not On Thursday 28 June 2001 00:49, Landy Roman wrote:
so how can it be considered stable if its under develpment
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:48:27 +0200
Anders Johansson
wrote: Because it's a development version, not really meant for public use.
When it's considered ready, it'll be in the update tree on the ftp (currently there's 2.4.4-29 there now)
On Thursday 28 June 2001 00:42, Landy Roman wrote:
and why not suse have 2.4.5 and the regular localtion
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:36:10 -0700
Ben Rosenberg
wrote: Get the modutils for 2.4.2 and then get the 2.4.5 kernel from /pub/people/mantel/next/RPM...why go with something as old as 2.4.2..when 2.4.5 is the current stable.
* Victor R. Cardona (vcardon@siue.edu) [010627 14:29]: ->I was going to upgrade my SuSE 7.1 installation to kernel 2.4.2 on
the
->SuSE FTP site. I noticed that the directory was marked "Do not
use" I
->have not been able to find out why it was marked as such. I was
hoping
->that perhaps someone from SuSE would be able to shed some light on
it.
-> ->Thanks, ->Victor -> -> ->-- ->To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com ->For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
->Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the ->archives at http://lists.suse.com ->
-- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org ----- The only argument for the superiority of Windows over UNIX is that General Protection Fault outranks Colonel Panic.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com