Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3627 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] MS Word, Federal standards, and Linux
- From: Olle Viksten <olle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 06:08:54 +0200
- Message-id: <01061606085400.27821@pingu>
fredagen den 15 juni 2001 23:32 wrote Paul Abrahams:
> I'm currently dealing with the following problem: I have a
> document I'm going to be creating that I have to distribute
> to a number of people, most of whom aren't particularly
> technically oriented and (I have to assume) aren't using
> Linux and aren't going to. I hate to resort to using an MS
> Word file, but I really see no practical alternative. (No,
> I'm not going to go down in flames as a Linux evangelist in
> this context.)
In similar circumstances I save the document as RTF, everyone should be able
to read that.
> But the pickle I'm in made me think of a neat way to use
> Microsoft's own "embrace and extend" strategy against it.
> Suppose the MS Word format were to be adopted as a FIPS
> (Federal Information Processing Standard). That would
> imply, among other things, that (a) the format was
> completely documented and available for use by anyone, and
> (b) that Microsoft could no longer change it unilaterally.
> If it's a de facto standard, then let's make it a de jure
> standard!
I shouldn't reveal this secret but the majority of humans live outside of the
USA . :-)
> I'm currently dealing with the following problem: I have a
> document I'm going to be creating that I have to distribute
> to a number of people, most of whom aren't particularly
> technically oriented and (I have to assume) aren't using
> Linux and aren't going to. I hate to resort to using an MS
> Word file, but I really see no practical alternative. (No,
> I'm not going to go down in flames as a Linux evangelist in
> this context.)
In similar circumstances I save the document as RTF, everyone should be able
to read that.
> But the pickle I'm in made me think of a neat way to use
> Microsoft's own "embrace and extend" strategy against it.
> Suppose the MS Word format were to be adopted as a FIPS
> (Federal Information Processing Standard). That would
> imply, among other things, that (a) the format was
> completely documented and available for use by anyone, and
> (b) that Microsoft could no longer change it unilaterally.
> If it's a de facto standard, then let's make it a de jure
> standard!
I shouldn't reveal this secret but the majority of humans live outside of the
USA . :-)
| < Previous | Next > |