Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3261 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] SuSE! What's up with the inconsistent src.rpms?
- From: wilson@xxxxxxxxxxx (Jonathan Wilson)
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 11:27:53 -0500
- Message-id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010427112131.0260bed0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At 10:00 AM 4/27/2001 +0200, you wrote:
>* Jonathan Wilson [Thu, 19 Apr 2001 13:13:43 -0500]:
1. I was wrong to post this in the first palce - that's nothing wrong with the RPM, it's for both apache and roxen
>First of all, could you in future please wrap your line at something
>less than 75 chars?
No, I could not. I do not like line wrapping because it messes up code examples very badly, and also on long topic-threads, line wrapping causes ugly formatting in the form of one-word and one-character lines that make things difficult to read. If you, or anyone, does not like long lines, you should find a mail reader that does the wrapping for you.
I makes much more sense for people who want line wrapping to find a reader that wraps rather then asking everyone on the net to wrap it before they send.
Sorry.
>It makes reading your mail much easier in some text
>mode mail readers and it's also standard netiquette.
Sorry again, but I think maybe you'd be happier with a reader that did wrapping for you.
>>I don't care who says what, SOMEONE labled the roxen mod_php4 srpm as the src.rpm
>>for mod_php4-4.0.4pl1-33.i386.rpm but it is obviously not the one SuSE used internally.
>
>Yes, it *is* the correct source rpm, rest asured.
Bingo.
>>ATTN SuSE: I need the real mod_php4-4.0.4pl1-33.src.rpm ,
>>could you please put it up really soon,
>
>Please note that your chances of reaching SuSE are much higher when
>sending a mail to feedback@xxxxxxxx There are only a few employees on
>this list and all of them don't get paid for participating here.
True. I was just complaining - bad me :-O
>And you've already got the right src.rpm ;-)
Yup.
>>or else explain to me why the current one says it's for the Roxen
>>web server?
>
>Slight error of our internal maintainer. I'll see to it tomorrow.
Well I'm not so sure there is anything wrong with it after all, is there?
>Philipp
----------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Wilson
System Administrator
Cedar Creek Software http://www.cedarcreeksoftware.com
Central Texas IT http://www.centraltexasit.com
>* Jonathan Wilson [Thu, 19 Apr 2001 13:13:43 -0500]:
1. I was wrong to post this in the first palce - that's nothing wrong with the RPM, it's for both apache and roxen
>First of all, could you in future please wrap your line at something
>less than 75 chars?
No, I could not. I do not like line wrapping because it messes up code examples very badly, and also on long topic-threads, line wrapping causes ugly formatting in the form of one-word and one-character lines that make things difficult to read. If you, or anyone, does not like long lines, you should find a mail reader that does the wrapping for you.
I makes much more sense for people who want line wrapping to find a reader that wraps rather then asking everyone on the net to wrap it before they send.
Sorry.
>It makes reading your mail much easier in some text
>mode mail readers and it's also standard netiquette.
Sorry again, but I think maybe you'd be happier with a reader that did wrapping for you.
>>I don't care who says what, SOMEONE labled the roxen mod_php4 srpm as the src.rpm
>>for mod_php4-4.0.4pl1-33.i386.rpm but it is obviously not the one SuSE used internally.
>
>Yes, it *is* the correct source rpm, rest asured.
Bingo.
>>ATTN SuSE: I need the real mod_php4-4.0.4pl1-33.src.rpm ,
>>could you please put it up really soon,
>
>Please note that your chances of reaching SuSE are much higher when
>sending a mail to feedback@xxxxxxxx There are only a few employees on
>this list and all of them don't get paid for participating here.
True. I was just complaining - bad me :-O
>And you've already got the right src.rpm ;-)
Yup.
>>or else explain to me why the current one says it's for the Roxen
>>web server?
>
>Slight error of our internal maintainer. I'll see to it tomorrow.
Well I'm not so sure there is anything wrong with it after all, is there?
>Philipp
----------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Wilson
System Administrator
Cedar Creek Software http://www.cedarcreeksoftware.com
Central Texas IT http://www.centraltexasit.com
| < Previous | Next > |