Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3261 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Support vs Support (Was: [SLE] util-linux and Kernel 2.4.3)
- From: Mike <bcomber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:09:14 +0200
- Message-id: <01042419091405.10951@linux>
On Monday 23 April 2001 23:37, you wrote:
> ROFL
>
>
> Maybe SuSe forgot that kernel upgrades are standard.
Kinda like putting a new larger engine in the car right? Free for the taking?
Give me a break.
> BTW - with the attitude SuSe has taken towards it's
> refusal to fix problems in the distributions which
> become apearent THROUGH support, they can not ever
> be recommended for enterprise systems.
By you?? No way.
Refusal to fix problems? Get a grip. They have more fixes out that most
distros have packages.
> Ruben
>
> > This is *EXACTLY* what it's all about.
> >
> > But maybe the complaining people simply forgot that?
--
Powered by SuSE 7.1, Kernel 2.4.2 KDE2.1.1
For a great linux portal try http://www.freezer-burn.org
> ROFL
>
>
> Maybe SuSe forgot that kernel upgrades are standard.
Kinda like putting a new larger engine in the car right? Free for the taking?
Give me a break.
> BTW - with the attitude SuSe has taken towards it's
> refusal to fix problems in the distributions which
> become apearent THROUGH support, they can not ever
> be recommended for enterprise systems.
By you?? No way.
Refusal to fix problems? Get a grip. They have more fixes out that most
distros have packages.
> Ruben
>
> > This is *EXACTLY* what it's all about.
> >
> > But maybe the complaining people simply forgot that?
--
Powered by SuSE 7.1, Kernel 2.4.2 KDE2.1.1
For a great linux portal try http://www.freezer-burn.org
| < Previous | Next > |