Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3261 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Samba And PDC
- From: Tor Sigurdsson <tosi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 02:12:48 +0000
- Message-id: <01041902124800.01013@dustpuppy>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
You wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> Anyone out there have experience with 'making' Samba on SuSE 7.0
> authenticate to a 'real' (and I use that term lightly) Windows NT PDC? Any
> info would be GREAT...
Hi,
How you tell samba to authenticate against a PDC should be the same
regardless of the underlying platform. This is how I do it on several unices:
[global]
workgroup = NAME_OF_WORKGROUP
netbios name = NETBIOS_NAME_OF_COMPUTER
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = PDC, BDC
syslog = 2
syslog only = Yes
name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast
time server = Yes
character set = ISO8859-1
local master = No
wins proxy = Yes
wins server = 192.168.10.2
NIS homedir = Yes
hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.5. 192.168.10.
queuepause command = /usr/ucb/lpc stop %p
queueresume command = /usr/ucb/lpc start %p
rest of file is just as normal....
- -tosi
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Rey [mailto:crrey@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 6:27 PM
> To: Mike; suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [SLE] Why?
>
>
> You got it! Don't get me wrong, so far I'm fairly pleased overall with
> SuSE
>
> 7.1. But issues lilke the kernel upgrades via yast, suse rpms and the suse
> ftp have me very frustrated at times. And alsa modules seem to be very
> fickle. One of the things that frustrates me is that it seems that SuSE
> tries to discourage kernel upgrades and since there are issue that someone
> might need to know that are specific to the SuSE distro in regards to a
> kernel upgrades and config - the lack of any good docs or SuSE kernel
> HOWTOs
>
> only exacerbates my frustrations! If there is any info specific to these
> types of upgrades I'd really like to know where they are. RTFM is hard to
> do
> when you can't find any FM to R. :-)
>
> On Wednesday 18 April 2001 09:41, Mike wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 April 2001 07:40, you wrote:
> > > Why is it that when ever I install anything from the suse ftp site that
> > > it seems broken or breaks something else. From what I can tell by
> > > reading the other posts on the list, I'm not the only one to have this
> > > problem. Thought that using rpms from the suse site would mean that
> > > they would be compatible and tailored to the distro - guess not!
> >
> > Such as?? So far I've picked up most of the rpm's I need from the update
> > service. I've also done the 2.4.2 kernel update, gone from kde2.0.1 to
> > 2.1.0 to 2.1.1 without any problems.
> >
> > Of course, it could just be the luck of the irish.. ;-) One little quirk
> > that I did notice is that when doing to kernel upgrade, it removes the
> > modules directory from /lib/modules. Thus your old kernel doesn't work
> > right. I thought I'd done something strange so I 'downgraded' to the old
> > kernel in hopes it would put the modules back in. It did. But removed the
> > 2.4.2 modules. Still haven't figured that one out. But I don't use the
> > old 2.4.0 kernel anymore, so I haven't gotten into it.
> >
> > Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE63kml6mRH+PEpr2YRAlEVAJ9RY0e4FtoVqtTkK1ZSoBjUnwGn3gCdG0gF
HWVOlLzS+fuDZKMrgHF81uw=
=IfDC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
You wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> Anyone out there have experience with 'making' Samba on SuSE 7.0
> authenticate to a 'real' (and I use that term lightly) Windows NT PDC? Any
> info would be GREAT...
Hi,
How you tell samba to authenticate against a PDC should be the same
regardless of the underlying platform. This is how I do it on several unices:
[global]
workgroup = NAME_OF_WORKGROUP
netbios name = NETBIOS_NAME_OF_COMPUTER
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = PDC, BDC
syslog = 2
syslog only = Yes
name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast
time server = Yes
character set = ISO8859-1
local master = No
wins proxy = Yes
wins server = 192.168.10.2
NIS homedir = Yes
hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.5. 192.168.10.
queuepause command = /usr/ucb/lpc stop %p
queueresume command = /usr/ucb/lpc start %p
rest of file is just as normal....
- -tosi
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Rey [mailto:crrey@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 6:27 PM
> To: Mike; suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [SLE] Why?
>
>
> You got it! Don't get me wrong, so far I'm fairly pleased overall with
> SuSE
>
> 7.1. But issues lilke the kernel upgrades via yast, suse rpms and the suse
> ftp have me very frustrated at times. And alsa modules seem to be very
> fickle. One of the things that frustrates me is that it seems that SuSE
> tries to discourage kernel upgrades and since there are issue that someone
> might need to know that are specific to the SuSE distro in regards to a
> kernel upgrades and config - the lack of any good docs or SuSE kernel
> HOWTOs
>
> only exacerbates my frustrations! If there is any info specific to these
> types of upgrades I'd really like to know where they are. RTFM is hard to
> do
> when you can't find any FM to R. :-)
>
> On Wednesday 18 April 2001 09:41, Mike wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 April 2001 07:40, you wrote:
> > > Why is it that when ever I install anything from the suse ftp site that
> > > it seems broken or breaks something else. From what I can tell by
> > > reading the other posts on the list, I'm not the only one to have this
> > > problem. Thought that using rpms from the suse site would mean that
> > > they would be compatible and tailored to the distro - guess not!
> >
> > Such as?? So far I've picked up most of the rpm's I need from the update
> > service. I've also done the 2.4.2 kernel update, gone from kde2.0.1 to
> > 2.1.0 to 2.1.1 without any problems.
> >
> > Of course, it could just be the luck of the irish.. ;-) One little quirk
> > that I did notice is that when doing to kernel upgrade, it removes the
> > modules directory from /lib/modules. Thus your old kernel doesn't work
> > right. I thought I'd done something strange so I 'downgraded' to the old
> > kernel in hopes it would put the modules back in. It did. But removed the
> > 2.4.2 modules. Still haven't figured that one out. But I don't use the
> > old 2.4.0 kernel anymore, so I haven't gotten into it.
> >
> > Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE63kml6mRH+PEpr2YRAlEVAJ9RY0e4FtoVqtTkK1ZSoBjUnwGn3gCdG0gF
HWVOlLzS+fuDZKMrgHF81uw=
=IfDC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |