Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3261 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Linux sees just one drive in a raid array?
- From: Alex Daniloff <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 10:24:40 -0700
- Message-id: <01041510244000.19537@gate>
Hello Cees,
On Sunday 15 April 2001 03:50 am, Cees van de Griend wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 08:55:22AM -0700, Alex Daniloff wrote:
> > Linux of course should see one hard drive but at capacity of combined
> > two. If I set up HW raid0 of two 20GB identical IDE hard drives Linux
> > should see just one big 40GB hard drive. In my case it sees one 20GB hard
> > drive. So I'm wonder how to correct this issue.
> > Thanks for any thoughts.
>
> I just looked up the raid levels:
>
> RAID 0 - reads and writes are done in parallel for performance increase
In this case it still should be just a one 40GB hard drive (20GB + 20GB) not
just 20GB.
> RAID 1 - mirrors disks for redundancy and performance increase
> RAID 5 - build large disks and redundancy information
>
RAID1 and RAID 5 are not applicable in my case.
> So, it looks like Linux is right (as usual <grin>).
In my case I doubt it.
Regards.
Alex
>
> N.B. at RAID 5, the parity information is distributed between all the
> disks, so you have to substact the size of a disk from the total size.
>
> It looks to me lvm - Logical Volume Manager - is more what you want.
> This creates a virtual disk and is a software sollution.
>
> Regards,
> Cees.
--
MS Windows users should be covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act!
--------------> Try Linux and you'll understand why <--------------
On Sunday 15 April 2001 03:50 am, Cees van de Griend wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 08:55:22AM -0700, Alex Daniloff wrote:
> > Linux of course should see one hard drive but at capacity of combined
> > two. If I set up HW raid0 of two 20GB identical IDE hard drives Linux
> > should see just one big 40GB hard drive. In my case it sees one 20GB hard
> > drive. So I'm wonder how to correct this issue.
> > Thanks for any thoughts.
>
> I just looked up the raid levels:
>
> RAID 0 - reads and writes are done in parallel for performance increase
In this case it still should be just a one 40GB hard drive (20GB + 20GB) not
just 20GB.
> RAID 1 - mirrors disks for redundancy and performance increase
> RAID 5 - build large disks and redundancy information
>
RAID1 and RAID 5 are not applicable in my case.
> So, it looks like Linux is right (as usual <grin>).
In my case I doubt it.
Regards.
Alex
>
> N.B. at RAID 5, the parity information is distributed between all the
> disks, so you have to substact the size of a disk from the total size.
>
> It looks to me lvm - Logical Volume Manager - is more what you want.
> This creates a virtual disk and is a software sollution.
>
> Regards,
> Cees.
--
MS Windows users should be covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act!
--------------> Try Linux and you'll understand why <--------------
| < Previous | Next > |