Hi, I fully agree with keeping Yast. I'm not using X-windows, because my linux box is only running as a router, mailserver, etc in a network. It doesn't even have a keyboard and monitor connected to it. So I prefer using a terminal emulator to maintain that machine. Best regards, Geert-Jan de Laat
-----Original Message----- From: joe lerch [mailto:jel2@earthlink.net] Sent: donderdag 15 maart 2001 5:17 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] Please oh please don't ko yast1!!!!!!!
On Thursday 15 March 2001 00:00, you wrote:
While YaST2 is prettier, and there are some newer tasks that only YaST2 can do, like ALSA sound setup, YaST1 is still more flexable and powerful, along with being easier to use, believe it or not. It's also faster. SuSE, KEEP IT!
I want to echo these thoughts. The worst part of my upgrade to SuSE 7.1 was using Yast2. The people at SuSE appear to be making the move to YaST 2, which is ok for new users but for people that have learned linux using SuSE ( started with 5.3) and YaST, the people at SuSE should keep YaST. Give the people a choice, it's that freedom to choose that makes Linux far better than a proprietary system that forces you to take certain options.
joe
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
Disclaimer 1. This e-mail is for the intended recipient only. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; access, disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited. 2. If you as intended recipient have received this e-mail incorrectly, please notify the sender (via e-mail) immediately. This e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. DSM does not guarantee that the information sent and/or received by or with this e-mail is correct and does not accept any liability for damages related thereto.