---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: failure notice Date: 9 Mar 2001 08:29:27 -0000 From: MAILER-DAEMON@lists.suse.com To: hattons@bellatlantic.net Hi. This is the qmail-send program at lists.suse.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <suse-linux-e@ns2.suse.com>: ezmlm-send: fatal: message already has a Mailing-List header (maybe I should be a sublist) (#5.7.2) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <hattons@bellatlantic.net> Received: (qmail 8293 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2001 08:29:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ns1.suse.com) (202.58.118.2) by ns2.suse.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2001 08:29:25 -0000 Received: from mail.houston.rr.com (unknown [24.93.35.226]) by ns1.suse.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144A1DF91B for <suse-linux-e@suse.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 00:16:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail pickup service by mail.houston.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 02:18:23 -0600 Received: from sm3.texas.rr.com ([24.93.35.210]) by mail.houston.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Tue, 6 Mar 2001 01:15:11 -0600 Received: from wormwood.pobox.com (wormwood.pobox.com [208.210.124.20]) by sm3.texas.rr.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2674QU16071 for <trentnougen@houston.rr.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 01:04:27 -0600 Received: from wormwood.pobox.com (localhost.pobox.com [127.0.0.1]) by wormwood.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1892472515 for <trentnougen@houston.rr.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 02:12:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from lists.suse.com (host1.SuSE.com [202.58.118.3]) by wormwood.pobox.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C77627250C for <tnguyen@pobox.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 02:12:33 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 6543 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2001 07:12:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact suse-linux-e-help@suse.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes list-help: mailto:suse-linux-e-help@lists.suse.com list-unsubscribe: mailto:suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@lists.suse.com list-post: mailto:suse-linux-e@suse.com X-Mailinglist: suse-linux-e Delivered-To: mailing list suse-linux-e@lists.suse.com Received: (qmail 6536 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2001 07:12:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Steven T. Hatton" <hattons@bellatlantic.net> Organization: Global Symmetry To: <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 02:12:28 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <01030522531902.01342@gate> In-Reply-To: <01030522531902.01342@gate> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0103060212280I.00755@nariana> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [SLE] When eth0 and eth1 activated? Sender: suse-linux-e-return-49485-tnguyen=pobox.com@suse.com On Tuesday 06 March 2001 01:53, Alex Daniloff wrote:
Hello SuSE folkz, I was getting messages about failing firewall initialization. Here are the lines from boot.msg file:
Master Resource Control: previous runlevel: N, switching to runlevel: 5 Starting Firewall Initialization: (phase 1 of 3) (run 2 of 3) Warning: interface eth1 is not active. Warning: interface eth0 is not active. No interfaces active! exiting ... SuSEfirewall: clearing rules now ... done failed
Could somebody tell me please at what moment (runlevel) my ethernet cards are being activated? Do firewall services failed due to eth0/eth1 are not activated at this moment or there is another reason? Thanks in advance for any hints. Alex
Alex, If it makes you feel better, I'm getting the same thing. I really don't know. If I find a clue. I'll post it. Steve -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq -------------------------------------------------------