Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2974 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] XFree86-4.0.2 && ATI-r128 && mozilla == false
- From: Avi Schwartz <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:49:22 -0600
- Message-id: <65600000.981938962@seahorse>
Well my friend, my email was much more usefull then your rude reply.
The reason I didn't report this font is that different people have different fonts and it is not a single font that causes this problem. In my case the fonts were the pala.ttf, palab.ttf, palabi.ttf and palai.ttf. Other people have reported other fonts.
Avi
--On Sunday, February 11, 2001 07:19:04 PM -0500 Doug McGarrett <dougmack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--
Avi Schwartz Get a Life,
avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Get Linux!
The reason I didn't report this font is that different people have different fonts and it is not a single font that causes this problem. In my case the fonts were the pala.ttf, palab.ttf, palabi.ttf and palai.ttf. Other people have reported other fonts.
Avi
--On Sunday, February 11, 2001 07:19:04 PM -0500 Doug McGarrett <dougmack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I can't believe that you don't report the name of this font to the list.
What good is your email?
At 17:06 02/11/2001 -0600, you wrote:
There is a bug in the TTF code that may crash XF86 4.02 when an
application tries to generate a font list when certain (buggy?) ttf
fonts are installed. After much trial and error I found which font
caused XF86 to crash on my machine when Mulberry was gathering the font
information. Once I removed the font, I had no more crashes. BTW, I
am running the nightly Mozilla builds and except for some bugs, it
seems to very very stable and usable. So much so, that it became my
main browser.
Avi
--On Sunday, February 11, 2001 05:29:29 PM -0500 "Steven T. Hatton"
<hattons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yup! That's what it is says. I'm not sure why, but mozilla seems to
crash my XFree86-4.0.2 faster than any other app. If I open mozilla's
latest nightly and shake the window around a bit X restarts without
fail. Perhaps this problem will be resolved with SuSE 7.1 when it gets
here. I sure hope so.
BTW, does anybody know if the build of X would be effected by the
kernel? I know the kernel build produces an r128.o for the DRI module.
I've tried building that directly into the kernel and that didn't fix
the problem. I would not be working so hard on this just to get the
latest X to work. I'm doing it so I can learn. Nonetheless it is very
frustrating.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
--
Avi Schwartz Get a Life,
avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Get Linux!
--
To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
--
Avi Schwartz Get a Life,
avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Get Linux!
| < Previous | Next > |