Volker Kuhlmann wrote: [snip]
I can't see a huge advantage of opera over konqueror. A few drawbacks in konqueror will be fixed soon. The development speed of opera doesn't appear to be neckbreaking. If however opera had been onto it and had a fine polished web browser now(!), it'd be worth money. As is, EUR40 for a stripped down beta is over the top.
Volker, for me, there's only 3 things that need fixing and/or adding to Konqueror to make it 100% viable for me. First, JAVA...not good support, and then add features to send a page AND also send a link. Other than that, Konqueror is FAST and reliable. If they'd do what should have been done a long time ago in Kmail, and all ALL recipients to be bcc (blind copy), I'd use nothing but Kmail. 'Hope all this has been fixed in 7.1 with a new KDE2. Fred -- ----/ / _ Fred A. Miller ---/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Systems Administrator --/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / Cornell Univ. Press Services -/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ fm@cupserv.org