Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:39:14 -0800
From: Robert Sweet
At 07:06 PM 11/10/2000 +0100, you wrote:
Thanks for the response. I thought that they also said that crashintoches
They sure crash a lot less often then Windows....
were easy to use.
Can you honestly name an OS that's easier to use?
Does anyone still write software for them?
Only tiny companies that no one has ever heard of like Adobe, Microsoft, Quark, all the various producers of games ( I don't play games so I don't know an company names to state here, but I know they're out there).... plenty, really. Just pick up a MacMall or Mac Warehouse catalog and you'll find plenty of stuff.
Having had to suffer them at work for 2 years now I think not!
I think that's slightly mis-guided. Don't forget that macs have a different orientation then PCs do: they aren't servers, and there very graphics- and UI- centric.... yes I know many people don't want that, but some people do :-).
Just because you don't care for Macs doesn't mean they're trash.
JW
Being in the graphics arts field, all I can is Macs stand on their own. I think mac OS X (ten) will be great. If it is all they say, I may even buy a new mac. Much rather dual boot mac 0S X and Linux, than windoze. -- rsweet@socal.rr.com | "There is a God, but He drinks" -o) | -- Blore Linux, the Choice /\ | of a GNU generation _\_v | |