-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 If that's the case, is there an over-riding reason why RPM was chosen as the package system, other than popular familiarity? Was the Debian system considered? (Not that I've used it, but I've read some about it...) Regards, Geordon
>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 10/11/00, 7:04:00 AM, Michael Hasenstein
I just popped in the DVD, told YAST2 to install "almost everything" and went downstairs to watch the Winston Cup race on TV. I did not time it, but it was at least a couple of hours. Everything ran fine except for a
rpm is _very_ inefficient when the rpm database gets bigger. Unfortunately, we are not the maintainers of this program and therefore cannot change anything, and those who could won't do it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies. iQA/AwUBOeR2glzQFL1YhZoEEQLhjQCfQm8g37dUfeLx/uFcliF+rlA7HSwAoMma pLGe2lezYM8/ZjLAPcdAsjUK =fU2o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq