Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2269 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] NFS to an AS/400
  • From: gholmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Glenn Holmer)
  • Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 08:49:32 -0500
  • Message-id: <39DB356C.A3BAA3AB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Bruce wrote:
>
> Yes this is VERY significant. I asked you whether or not your system was open
> for action on PORTS 111 and 2049.

And I answered:
> > Interestingly, a portscanner does *not* show anything on 2049 on the
> > AS/400 (nor in the services listing), although 111 is there. But
> > older SuSE's (e.g. 6.3) can connect properly!

> You may have to get the nfs daemon to listen on port 111.
> Or use port option for mount.
> Try (and I haven't tested it) mount -t nfs node:/ /directory port=111

The AS/400 *is* listening on 111. The issue is TCP vs. UDP, not port
number.
The comm trace I took on the AS/400 shows both failing and succeeding
attempts
coming in on 111.

IBM later called back and said that they do not support NFS mounts over
TCP
on the AS/400, only UDP.

I tried "mount -o udp weyco400:/ /mnt/weyco400" and still get the same
error:

pmap_getmaps rpc problem: RPC: Procedure unavailable
mount: RPC: Unable to receive; errno = Connection refused

A comm trace of this attempt shows that the connection is being
attempted
with TCP despite the "-o udp" option.

This is important enough to the company that at this point I am leaning
toward banning 7.0 on production machines in our shop.


--
____________________________________________________________
Glenn Holmer gholmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Programmer/Analyst phone: 414.908.1809
Weyco Group, Inc. fax: 414.908.1601

--
To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq


< Previous Next >
Follow Ups
References