Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2425 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
RE: [SLE] System slow with 6.3
- From: kevin.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kevin Jackson)
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:29:03 +0100
- Message-id: <957A74A1FE52D311907A0008C70DB9021A603E@JHPDC>
The company I work for have a number of Compaqs - including a large quantity
of Compaq servers.
My own work workstation - from where I'm writing this email - is a PIII
450MHz Compaq, with an 8Gb SCSI drive and 128Mb RAM. It is crap. On paper,
the spec is great - it really is - but in practise...
I had a small Toshiba PII 300 with 64Mb in and that is faster than this.
I don't want flames, neither!
Kev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris.Smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chris.Smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 01 June 2000 13:10
> To: Raghavendra R
> Cc: suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [SLE] System slow with 6.3
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Please note - This posting is not a Troll/Flamebait etc, but
> from experience...
>
> ** I understand 810 may not be a good processor to use as a server.
>
> Very true (810 is the chipset though).
>
> ** But, previous to this we had installed 6.2 on another Compaq with a
> Intel
> ** PIII 440BX with 256 Mb Ram. Even on this m/c, 6.2 Linux
> showed the same
> ** behavior of hanging / slowing down appreciabely when users
> work remotely
> ** or run some system commands or copy some big files.
>
> Notice two things common between the systems: Compaq.
>
> Just because Compaq has a big name, doesnt make their hardware
> well supported, reliable and predictable. My company (a pretty
> large one), has 800 odd workstations and 30 odd servers custom
> built using genuine Intel boards and processors. These have
> never experienced this kind of problem. We actually dropped
> Compaq as a viable solutions provider as their hardware wasn't
> consistant and/or reliable.
>
> ** Even here, the 'top'
> ** and free commands always seem to show the used memory at
> around 70 to 80
> ** % of the total memory of 256 Mb even just after booting.
> So, we cannot
> ** unilaterally blame it on 810.
>
> No, lets unilaterally blame it on Compaq.
>
> I suggest you go out and grab some bits to build your own system
> from precise requirements and shop parts. Get an Asus or Intel
> GX/BX board and use that. Do it and see the difference. See
> why you are throwing your cash down the toilet.
>
> Other people's opinions on Compaq are invited.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Chris Smith IS Dept - Raytheon Systems Limited
> [chris.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] +44 1279 407 103
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
> For additional commands send e-mail to
> suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
> Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
>
--
To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
| < Previous | Next > |