Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2141 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SuSE Linux] rpm's
  • From: tajc@xxxxxxxx (Tim Shann)
  • Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 08:14:52 -0500
  • Message-id: <36FE2B4C.E9148441@xxxxxxxx>



I like rpms because they are so easy to uninstall. I have no clue how to
remove tar.gz installs. Anyone care to give lessons?

Tim

Michael Perry wrote:

> On 27 Mar, Benjamin A. Rosenberg wrote:
> >
> > I have a question about RPM's. Why are they so much better then source?
> > I have used source for the last 5 years. When I try to use RPM's it's
> > usually a sticky situation.
> >
> > Thanks for any input. :)
>
> Just my extremely subjective opinion and I use both. I like rpms for
> some things like I downloaded rpms for the latest gnome stuff because I
> wanted to see gnome running but then I decided I wanted to compile
> things so I found that some of the program's configure scripts had
> problems so I installed gtk/glib. I tend to use an rpm for something
> quick that is packaged on the suse 6 cd's. As an example, after doing
> the gnome thing, gimp would not run because of failed dependencies for
> gtk. The gnome list informed me that you can actually have two
> versions of gtk installed hence the gtkn and glibn on the gnome site.
> I then installed the gtk and glib rpms from the suse cd. I still could
> not manually configure gimp 1.0.2 due to some issues with gtk or gtkn
> or gtk devel. When I decided I wanted the gimp, I did a yast install
> and all it wanted was aalib which I selected for auto.
>
> So my answer is that I use the best of both worlds. I think rpm's work
> for me but I like the control of configuring. I like configuring also
> but if I want something that seems rather complex and someone has built
> an rpm spec for it, I tend to grab it. I am a wimp I guess; but I
> still like the easy way that rpm offers. I have been stung a few times
> like with the craziness surrounding the gtk upgrade path with rpms. I
> also have installed my own self-rolled libs and had rpm installs fail
> but configures, make, and make installs work for the same program.
>
> I gave some thought to compiling kde 1.1 until I saw the rpms for 1.1 on
> suse's update site. Too much of a temptation for me :)
>
> --
> Michael Perry
> mperry@xxxxxxxxx
> ----------------------
>
> --
> To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@xxxxxxxx with
> this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
> Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/";><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the
> archive at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html";><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>


--
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@xxxxxxxx with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/";><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the
archive at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html";><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>


< Previous Next >
References