Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1587 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SuSE Linux] Bashing Revisited
- From: brauki@xxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Braukmann)
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 20:42:12 +0100
- Message-id: <36547494.F52EB00A@xxxxxxxxxx>
Steve Pauly wrote:
>
> Okay. You guys are killin' me!
>
> (I originally posted the "stop bashing Microsoft" post.)
;-))
>
> When you give an example of how Microsoft fails to perform in a given
> situation, AND give an example how Linux solves the problem, that is
> not bashing!!!
>
Well, I've cooled down a bit. In my example, sendmail and fetchmail
never let my down, they simply didn't work until proper configured.
Again, there were other problems around, linux was solveable.
For my M$ problem, as I heared today, I should have installed the
IE4.1SP1 package, that includes outlook express, a lean mail client.
this should be easier to configure that outlook or exchange. they are
unlogical, hidden and confused to set up. My exchange client at work
sends a hack of idiotic data behind every message. There is no known way
to stop this. consequently I cannot access this list from work, I would
be *fryed* by the list members.
After refusing to do anything with M$ (for obvious reasons) three years
ago, and still sticking to 3.11 at work, (just changing to NT) I am not
up to date with M$.
Win 3.11 spoiled many days. I called it a good day, when there was a
protection fault. Later, I changed the messages for the blue screens,
like:
your system is in a perfect working order.
it is hanging. say goodby to your data.
pull the plug.
> Bashing is unmitigated abuse. It's the act of bad mouthing something
> without explaining. Granted, it's FUN!
It realy is. I have people around that *love* and *praise* M$ and their
buisyness strategies. For fun, I hold against with *force*.
>
> That's what I meant...
>
> So, SO is a memory hog? Is Applix less so? I've heard Applix is less
> polished, but more stable and efficient. It gets the job done.
>
Yes it does. The older version, (Spreadshead) reminded me -functionally-
to Excel 3.0, particulary on the search (database) functions. In the
end, I dropped it for SO4.0. But: Applix Files can be edited with vi or
whatever you choose, it's text!
> Also, I hope SuSE 6.0 will benefit from RH's nightmare with glibc.
>
Yes, and I hope it won't turn into a nightmare. There are still more to
come:
egcs compiler and the 2.2.x kernels, as soon as these are officially
released. (Any rough dates for that??)
> Have a good day!
Thanks. Had a better day today. ;-)
Juergen
>
> Steve.
>
> ------------------------------------
> Steve Pauly (281) 496-8041
> Global Marine Drilling Co.
> stevep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> steve.pauly@xxxxxxx
> gmdcman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> -
> To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@xxxxxxxx with
> this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
--
========================================== __ _
Juergen Braukmann mail: brauki@xxxxxxxxxx| -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __
Tel: 0201-743648 dk4jb@db0qs.#nrw.deu.eu| /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
==========================================_\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
-
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@xxxxxxxx with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
| < Previous | Next > |