Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-wiki (58 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-wiki] Is it ok to use the wiki for "collaborative draft"?
- From: "Rajko M." <rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:05:01 -0500
- Message-id: <201006222205.01862.rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>
This is one of answers written recently on a question from KDE team wiki
editor.
The answer is:
There is no better place then the wiki.
Be aware that current http://wiki.opensuse.org will become
http://en.opensuse.org after July 12th, and vice versa ie. content of current
en.o.o would be possible to find on wiki.o.o .
The only thing that you should watch is to use as prefix to your articles
"openSUSE:", similar to http://wiki.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Sandbox
The "openSUSE:" is meta namespace allotted for openSUSE project and
subproject articles (files), from team information, work files, rules of
conduct and whatever we need to accomplish our tasks, so it is possible to use
that for temporary files.
Note that you have wiki in your hands and a need for temporary files should be
minimal. Create page, work on it, and when you are satisfied with content then
you are done. It is that simple. Your first draft of the page will be buried
somewhere in the article history.
Also I would consider to make use of categories.
You and the team can create articles about KDE applications, and categorize
them as:
[[Category:KDE applications]]
at the bottom of each article.
To those that are defaults you can add additional:
[[Category:Default KDE applications]]
as a second tag right below the first one.
That way you can link whole Category:Default KDE applications with
<categorytree>Default KDE applications</categorytree> tags, from Portal:KDE in
a right navigation panel.
The same principle should be applied to any other group of articles. Get rid
of manual indexes that run out of sync with real content very fast.
IMO,<categorytree> is nice and easy and that is the main reason that wiki team
insists on use of categories.
--
Regards Rajko,
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
editor.
The answer is:
There is no better place then the wiki.
Be aware that current http://wiki.opensuse.org will become
http://en.opensuse.org after July 12th, and vice versa ie. content of current
en.o.o would be possible to find on wiki.o.o .
The only thing that you should watch is to use as prefix to your articles
"openSUSE:", similar to http://wiki.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Sandbox
The "openSUSE:" is meta namespace allotted for openSUSE project and
subproject articles (files), from team information, work files, rules of
conduct and whatever we need to accomplish our tasks, so it is possible to use
that for temporary files.
Note that you have wiki in your hands and a need for temporary files should be
minimal. Create page, work on it, and when you are satisfied with content then
you are done. It is that simple. Your first draft of the page will be buried
somewhere in the article history.
Also I would consider to make use of categories.
You and the team can create articles about KDE applications, and categorize
them as:
[[Category:KDE applications]]
at the bottom of each article.
To those that are defaults you can add additional:
[[Category:Default KDE applications]]
as a second tag right below the first one.
That way you can link whole Category:Default KDE applications with
<categorytree>Default KDE applications</categorytree> tags, from Portal:KDE in
a right navigation panel.
The same principle should be applied to any other group of articles. Get rid
of manual indexes that run out of sync with real content very fast.
IMO,<categorytree> is nice and easy and that is the main reason that wiki team
insists on use of categories.
--
Regards Rajko,
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |