On 25.04.2010 16:21, Daniel Gollub wrote:
Hi,
the last days i started with namespace-screening of all first-level articles of en.o.o. Divided those into SDB:, openSUSE: and main Namespace (and marked those as obsolete which were already marked as obslete or looked obsolete to me).
The intermediate result is:
http://people.b1-systems.de/~gollub/private/wiki.o.o/namespace-review.php
- main: 15 articles - SDB: 549 articles - openSUSE: 543 articles - obsolete: 447 articles - not-yet-reviewed/undecided: 231 articles
* SUSE Studio: there are tons of SUSE Studio articles, which should be moved in common SUSE_Studio/ hierarchy. Not quite sure if SUSE-Studio should really live inside the openSUSE: namespace at all. Any suggestion for this? Maybe not transferring at all? Maybe it's obsolete - never worked with it ...
Maybe we should offer the studio team an own namespace to maintain their documentation, so they can also decide if they want to use the flaggedrevs stuff. It is for sure not obsolete... ;-)
not-yet-reviewed/undecided ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We also have the 'Archive' namespace, maybe some stuff fits there. Wouldn't it be nice to develop a script that does a complete page migration including setting the migrated template on the old page? Greetings -- Thomas Schmidt (tschmidt [at] suse.de) SUSE Linux Products GmbH :: Research & Development :: Tools "Don't Panic", Douglas Adams (1952 - 11.05.2001) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org