Hi, the last days i started with namespace-screening of all first-level articles of en.o.o. Divided those into SDB:, openSUSE: and main Namespace (and marked those as obsolete which were already marked as obslete or looked obsolete to me). The intermediate result is: http://people.b1-systems.de/~gollub/private/wiki.o.o/namespace-review.php - main: 15 articles - SDB: 549 articles - openSUSE: 543 articles - obsolete: 447 articles - not-yet-reviewed/undecided: 231 articles main ~~~~ Quality selection for openSUSE Distro. presentation. Require some more dedicated promo wiki pages which are not mixed-up with instructions or too many technical details ... Baybe i couldn't find the intended good wiki pages. (Or is there only the openSUSE_$Version page for each release for promo?) SDB ~~~~ All HOWTOs, tutorial, (hardware-setup) instructions, guides, support instructions, tips, ... not directly relevant to the openSUSE- project/development. But relevant for the openSUSE distribution. There are several articles which were intentionally something like an application/project promotion page, but ended up to be a setup-instruction ... so the title might be often misleading. openSUSE: ~~~~~~~~~ * everything direct related to openSUSE Distro. development, contribution, (/Bugs:*, ...), research, ... * openSUSE Project organizational stuff * openSUSE developed applications: yast * SUSE Studio: there are tons of SUSE Studio articles, which should be moved in common SUSE_Studio/ hierarchy. Not quite sure if SUSE-Studio should really live inside the openSUSE: namespace at all. Any suggestion for this? Maybe not transferring at all? Maybe it's obsolete - never worked with it ... * openSUSE-nerd-nonsense: /SOCKS, ... * It also includes lots of SLE and Novell mixed-up-stuff. Stuff like obsolete: ~~~~~~~~~~ * everything which was exclusively for version 11.0 and lower * empty or "todo" articles * by accident i18n pages: [A-Z]-$en_article (but easy to filter) * and really bad wiki content ... only code-snippets * manual written redirects * cry for help articles * branding overviews for older distributions * obsolete tool documentation: smart, zen, zmd, ... * pages already reviewed as obsolete not-yet-reviewed/undecided ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * articles i don't want to assign to the main namespace * not quite sure if relevant for openSUSE: or SDB: - "application promotion" there are vast amount of application promotion articles: reaching from incomplete, to low-quality up to top quality. I would suggest to mark all incomplete pages and low quality (e.g. only brief description - wasting-time-for-maintenance) as obsolete. Examples: http://en.opensuse.org//Abiword - Stub -> obsolete/no-transfer? http://en.opensuse.org//Fluxbox - mix-up of tutorial/promotion -> ??? http://en.opensuse.org//Inkscape - only brief description/ stub -> drop? http://en.opensuse.org//Mozilla_Suite ... brief desc./stub -> drop? http://en.opensuse.org//Blender - average quality /pure promotion -> ??? http://en.opensuse.org//Git - good quality / pure promotion -> ??? * stuff which is waste of time to maintain: - Computer-Science glossaries: /DMA, /BIOS, /PCI-X ... in my opinion a reference to wikipedia would be enough, since this is what all of those have in common. - Generic Programming Language articles: /Python - no content related to openSUSE Python specific stuff - drop? /Ruby - at least some trace related to openSUSE (BService) -> openSUSE:? - Generic file formats articles: /PDF, /Postscript, /SGML_and_XML -> drop? Comments? Best Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Gollub Geschaeftsfuehrer: Ralph Dehner FOSS Developer Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg B1 Systems GmbH Amtsgericht: Ingolstadt Handelsregister: HRB 3537 EMail: gollub@b1-systems.de http://www.b1-systems.de Adresse: B1 Systems GmbH, Osterfeldstraße 7, 85088 Vohburg http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xED14B95C2F8CA78D