Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-wiki (44 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-wiki] Testing FlaggedRevs Wiki QA
- From: Rupert Horstkötter <rhorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:26:51 +0100
- Message-id: <26d1a5471003050526t68be0c0l86d194b6dbc0c047@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2010/3/5 Rupert Horstkötter <rhorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
--
Rupert Horstkötter, open-slx gmbh
openSUSE Board Member
openSUSE Community Assistant
http://en.opensuse.org/User:Rhorstkoetter
Email: rhorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Jabber: ruperthorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
2010/3/4 Thomas Schmidt <tschmidt@xxxxxxx>:Err, s/and/and to get rid of
I added some links that may help for the reviewing process at the bottom ofThis is our new Wiki QA concept. As you know, we use FlaggedRevs
http://en.opensuse.org/Transition_guidelines
There is an rss feed for updates to reviewed pages here:
http://wiki.opensuse.org/index.php?title=Special:OldReviewedPages&feed=rss&namespace=&level=&category=
but unfortunately i found none for unreviewed new pages.
But we could use the standard feed for new pages in the Main namespace I
think:
http://wiki.opensuse.org/index.php?title=Special:NewPages&feed=rss&namespace=0
What advantages do we have from the import of these feeds into the forum?
extension to flag articles as "sighted", i.e. as approved openSUSE
documentation resource. Feeding the changes (i.e. new articles and
major edits to existing ones) to the forums is our approach to
implement a proof-reading, reviewing mechanism before new articles get
a "sighted" flag. Imagine you create a new page about "foobar", you
should get feedback from the community about the technical relevance,
correctness, the visual presentation, the ease of explanation etc.
etc. in order to provide you (the editor) an opportunity to improve
your article on community feedback. We hope to come up with higher
quality articles that way (four eyes recognize more than just two) and
the general former approach with the "sighted" flag that everyone
could just jump in and provide semi-professional or in the worst case
plain wrong information as openSUSE documentation. We try to achieve
an overall quality improvement here just by implementing a reviewing +
approval process.
HTH
For a meeting: I am 'digitltom' on freenode, hanging at least inThanks. I doubt we'll manage it this weekend already as we had too
#opensuse-project most
of the day.
less time to sync all interested parties.
Best,
R
Greetings
R
PS: Remy, sorry, but monkey business seems to be needed here. Seems we
should recruit at least one other Forums mod for the wiki forum.
Jim
<26d1a5471003022333s61a19d11pf60fb0728bf80cae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, RupertOn 3/3/2010 at 00:33, in message
Horstkötter<rhorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim,
2010/2/26 Jim Henderson <jhenderson@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Looking in the admin interface, it looks pretty straightforward to setfeed; it's not a custom bot, but part of the admin functionality in
up a
vBulletin. We'd need to create a forum for the feed to feed into and the
URL
to the XML doc that provides the RSS feed.
Actually that's exactly what I'm planning to do as soon as we thought
We could test this in the sandbox and then reset it for a public feed
view.
the "hack-possibilities" to auto-merge the thread whole through.
Grabbing the feed and posting doesn't seem to be an issue, providing
RSS with Hermes is fine as well. Remaining and most important now is
to investigate the re-opening/merging of subsequent threads related to
one single article "foobar"
All,
vBulletin doc is at http://www.vbulletin.com/docs/html/
Best,
R
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Program Manager, Novell Testing
Novell, Inc.
<26d1a5471002260448o5b6afa85r76f3e24021a7436b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, RupertOn 2/26/2010 at 05:48, in message
Horstkötter<rhorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,
2010/2/25 Thomas Schmidt <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I just got notice from Kim that he's rather unavailable these days due
According to http://www.vbulletin.com/ this is a
commercial product, I cannot even download the documentation...
So we need the technical forums admin to do that.
to too much on the plate atm. That said, I'll ask him about the
forumsbot configuration capabilities in a private conversation and
forward the answers to you. Also I try to get the vBulletin
documentation we need from him. Furthermore I herewith CC: the rest of
the admin team in order to ask for their involvement. Please keep the
CC: as is. I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
Forums admins,
we need some help/input regarding the FlaggedRevs Wiki QA, i.e. the
configuration capabilities of the RSS forumsbot. Kim is rather busy
these days, so I'm wondering if you, Carl, John, Jim would be able to
jump in as an interim replacement?
In order to sync up with the current discussion, please read this
thread [1]
Thanks,
R
[1] http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-wiki/2010-02/msg00069.html
--
Thomas Schmidt (tschmidt [at] suse.de)
SUSE Linux Products GmbH :: Research & Development :: Tools
"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
Pablo Picasso
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Rupert Horstkötter, open-slx gmbh
openSUSE Board Member
openSUSE Community Assistant
http://en.opensuse.org/User:Rhorstkoetter
Email: rhorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Jabber: ruperthorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Rupert Horstkötter, open-slx gmbh
openSUSE Board Member
openSUSE Community Assistant
http://en.opensuse.org/User:Rhorstkoetter
Email: rhorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Jabber: ruperthorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |