Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-wiki (149 mails)

[Rupert Horstkötter <rhorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

thanks for moving forward here. JFYI, I pinged Kim again at the forums
in order to get input about forums' bot capabilities. To my very own
knowledge, it's the autoposting bot that ships with vBulletin by
default. You're right that the re-opening of existing threads may be
an issue here. I hope it's capable in doing so in order to have a
structured thread-list (I see this as an urgent requirement .. maybe
you talented people can hack this together if not supported by
default?)

I'm OK with Rajko's idea to create a subforum for the QA also in
production to separate the QA from other threads, makes sense .. or
move non-QA discussions to a subforum.

As of namespaces: Please follow Rajko here as I lack the appropriate
knowledge to be honest. I mean, what we want the QA for is "distro",
i.e. end-user documentation and iirc we decided to have just that in
Main Namespace, separated from Help, Meetings, Project Docs etc (we
certainly don't need QA for those). Only docs interesting for our
customer (distro doc, app tutorials etc.) should be covered by QA.
Isn't that Main namespace, Rajko?

Best,
R

2010/2/25 Rajko M. <rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Sorry, I posted only to the list again.
> Repost to all, without ML.
>
> On Wednesday 24 February 2010 14:36:07 Thomas Schmidt wrote:
> > On 02/24/2010 05:16 AM, Rajko M. wrote:
> ...
> > > I mentioned in another post that FlaggedRevs have own output of pages
> > > that need review, and that gives only Main space RSS/Atom by default.
> > > Pages that never received any attention will be covered with output of
> > > another special page "new pages", that also has Main as default output to
> > > RSS/Atom.
> > >
> > > Those 2 outputs will cover all of the pages that need review.
> > > I guess that Tom can combine them in a single stream from Hermes.
> >
> > That might be possible, but I think it's easier to read those 2 feeds
> > with the rss->forum bot. Aren't the new pages of the Main namespace
> >  included in the 'pages need review' feed?
>
> No.
> That was the reason to look for another Special page that has missing pages in
> the first report.
>
> The other idea is to keep both reports separated, as old articles that have
> change are not as urgent as new articles that can be literally anything.
> Little mark at the top right that article is not reviewed is some help, but
> article is anyway presented to the wiki visitor.
>
> Below is link to both special pages for Kim. I used reply to mail list for the
> first post with this links, so it can be found in archives, but this way is
> easier:
> First is http://wiki.opensuse.org/Special:OldReviewedPages
> Second is http://wiki.opensuse.org/Special:NewPages
> >
>
> > Which software is this autoposting bot, do you have a url?
>
> Kim?



-- 
Rupert Horstkötter, open-slx gmbh
openSUSE Board Member
openSUSE Community Assistant
http://en.opensuse.org/User:Rhorstkoetter
Email: rhorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Jabber: ruperthorstkoetter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx