I agree as well. We want to encourage improvements to the documentation. Major changes should be discussed first, in my opinion. But on going improvements, spelling and grammar should certainly be encouraged. On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 06:50, Rupert Horstkötter <rhorstkoetter@opensuse.org> wrote:
Remy,
2010/2/1 Rémy Marquis <remy.marquis@gmail.com>:
Hi wiki team,
I changed the terms used by the "InReview" template (from "other should not make any changes" to "should not make any major changes"), as it's rather stupid to prevent other people to improve the articles with minor addition (ie, spelling mistakes, or important information that must get their way on the wiki).
+1, that makes perfect sense. Thanks for taking care and letting us know.
Also,
- are the "InRewiev", "Reviewed" on so on templates totally deprecated? Should we get rid of them to avoid possible confusion?
I feel the templates valuable as you see at first glance what the status of a particular article is when accessing it. With the modified "InReview" template also the minor changes questions is addressed. That said, I'm not sure if the Templates are still to be considered with Rajko's Transition_table approach. I leave it up to Wiki seniors to declare them as deprecated but I'd appreciate if we could keep them/marry them with Transition_table due to the reason I outlined. Please let me know.
Thanks, R
- To Jonathan_R : I saw that you have dozen of articles currently "InReview". Is it not a better idea to work on a limited number of articles and to finish/complete the work on them, rather that working on a large number of articles and thus, preventing other people to take care of them?
Regards,
R.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Rémy Marquis <remy.marquis@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Feel free to add your bugs in the list. The tags are here to avoid major changes. Also, it's rather not desirable to stop the work on in-going development documentation.
Regards,
R.
2010/2/1 Rastislav Krupanský <rastislav.krupansky@gmail.com>:
Hi. If i´d like to add some annoying bugs on wiki to prevent repeated/unnecessary reporting bugs, how is the procedure? This article is under review. The contents are currently being evaluated and edited by User:Jonathan_R. Others should not make any changes. Or can i add the most annoying bugs in M1 myself? Thanks.
-- S pozdravom / Best regards,
Rasto
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
-- Rupert Horstkötter, open-slx gmbh openSUSE Board Member openSUSE Community Assistant http://en.opensuse.org/User:Rhorstkoetter Email: rhorstkoetter@opensuse.org Jabber: ruperthorstkoetter@googlemail.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org