Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-softwaremgmt (29 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [softwaremgmt] 'zypper lu -t package' vs. 'zypper up -t package'
- From: "Christian Morales Vega" <cmorve69@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:53:42 +0200
- Message-id: <8235e6f40807160653j18f97cb0w1e9206f9d6705a22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2008/7/16 Jano Kupec <jkupec@xxxxxxx>:
-t package" to update my system, first the updates are listed... if I
don't want to update them just answer "no" to the "continue?"
question.
But if it's going to be mantained I like #1, but I would say 'up'
should also receive an option to behave like 'lu'. A command to list
updates that... you can't have doesn't makes sense. If you can show a
_raw_ list you should also be able to use that list for update.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-softwaremgmt+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-softwaremgmt+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Suggestions:I would argue the "lu" option isn't needed at all. I do "zypper -v up
1) Make 'lu' list what 'up' would show as 'to be upgraded' in the summary
+ provide an option for 'lu' to show the _raw_ list of available updates
as
it does currently.
2) Tell why there is a difference (and what is the difference) between 'lu'
and
'up' and suggest what to do.
#1 is my favorite :O) Any other suggestions? Votes?
-t package" to update my system, first the updates are listed... if I
don't want to update them just answer "no" to the "continue?"
question.
But if it's going to be mantained I like #1, but I would say 'up'
should also receive an option to behave like 'lu'. A command to list
updates that... you can't have doesn't makes sense. If you can show a
_raw_ list you should also be able to use that list for update.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-softwaremgmt+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-softwaremgmt+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |