On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Harald Koenig <koenig@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
On May 18, Michal Kubecek wrote:
... but in general, Leap 42.x and 42.(x+1) should be much closer to each other than e.g. 12.1 and 12.2. Therefore users should fear upgrading to next point release less and it should make much less sense to skip 42.2 and upgrade 42.1 systems directly to 42.3.
in general I understand and agree.
BUT I still have some 42.1 systems running just fine, and esp. now with 42.x and 42.(x+1) being "much closer", it would be nice (for us lazy admins with "legacy" 42.1 systems;) to skip the effort of upgrading to an intermeadiate 42.2 just to reach 42.3 RSN...
so either I have to ignore the 42.1 EOL and cross fingers while waiting for 42.3 being released, or there'll be 2 upgrades to be scheduled within short period (as I aim for 42.3 on all systems...)
Hi As a general principal if an upgrade is an issue then the systems are not engineered correctly. You should be able to break something without risk. It is more important to get used to change than expect a stable steady state. Regards, Chris
just my 0.02 EUR ;-)
Harald
"I hope to die ___ _____ before I *have* to use Microsoft Word.", 0--,| /OOOOOOO\ Donald E. Knuth, 02-Oct-2001 in Tuebingen. <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\ \ /OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO\ \ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|// ///////// Harald Koenig // / \ \ koenig@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de ^^^^^ ^^^^^
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-security+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-security+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-security+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-security+owner@opensuse.org