On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:26:25AM +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
Hi Marcus,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, 10:13:46 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:10:49AM +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
[...] So, I could work-around this by creating an entry in /etc/apt/preferences (similar to zypper's priority and locks mechanisms), but to me this sounds wrong. Shouldn't have an update package _always_ have a version number than its preceeding package, i.e. the one that the update should replace?!?! FWIW, I extracted both RPMs and compared the resulting directories, and there are indeed differences:
Of course... It is a bug in the patch building engine which got changed for 11.1
We fixed the other affected updates already, I just approved the fixed wireshark.
Thanks, I just installed the update; so, this problem is solved ;-)
BTW, why have glibc and glibc-devel differing version numbers on i586 and i686? These are the packages on the DVD:
i586/glibc-2.9-2.8.i586.rpm i586/glibc-devel-2.9-2.8.i586.rpm i686/glibc-2.9-2.3.i686.rpm i686/glibc-devel-2.9-2.3.i686.rpm
This would lead to an "update" for glibc using apt-get as well... Architectural "compatible" packages should have identical version numbers, shouldn't they?
Different problem... No idea.
Hmm, as it _is_ annoying, should I bugzilla this?
Yes. But I think its not changeable anymore since the media are frozen. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-security+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-security+help@opensuse.org